Challenges of modern work environments and means of overcoming them in the context of psychosocial risk assessments | BMC Public Health

0
Challenges of modern work environments and means of overcoming them in the context of psychosocial risk assessments | BMC Public Health
  • Stolterman E, Fors AC. Information Technology and the Good Life. In: Kaplan B, Truex DP, Wastell D, Wood-Harper AT, DeGross JI, editors. Information Systems Research: relevant Theory and informed practice. Boston, MA: Springer Science + Business Media Inc; 2004. pp. 687–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_45.

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gualano MR, Buttigieg S, Moscato U, Editorial. Impact of digitalization on workers’ health and work-life balance. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1204465. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1204465.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Amstad FT, Meier LL, Fasel U, Elfering A, Semmer NK. A meta-analysis of work–family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. J Occup Health Psychol. 2011;16:151–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022170.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohe C, Meier LL, Sonntag K, Michel A. The chicken or the egg? A meta-analysis of panel studies of the relationship between work–family conflict and strain. J Appl Psychol. 2015;100:522–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038012.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen TD, Johnson RC, Kiburz KM, Shockley KM. Work-family conflict and flexible work arrangements: deconstructing flexibility. Pers Psychol. 2013;66:345–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12012.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunau T, Bambra C, Eikemo TA, van der Wel KA, Dragano N. A balancing act? Work–life balance, health and well-being in European welfare states. Eur J Pub Health. 2014;24:422–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku010.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjärntoft S, Hallman DM, Mathiassen SE, Larsson J, Jahncke H. Occupational and Individual Determinants of Work-Life Balance among Office Workers with flexible work arrangements. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041418.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebig M, Müller A, Angerer P. Impact of the digitization in the Industry Sector on Work, Employment, and Health. In: Theorell T, editor. Handbook of Socioeconomic Determinants of Occupational Health: from macro-level to Micro-level evidence. Cham: Springer; 2019. pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05031-3_10-1.

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pansini M, Buonomo I, de Vincenzi C, Ferrara B, Benevene P. Positioning Technostress in the JD-R model perspective: a systematic literature review. Healthc (Basel). 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11030446.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brough P, O’Driscoll MP. Organizational interventions for balancing work and home demands: an overview. Work Stress. 2010;24:280–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2010.506808.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Tecco C, Persechino B, Iavicoli S. Psychosocial risks in the changing world of work: moving from the risk Assessment Culture to the Management of opportunities. Med Lav. 2023;114:e2023013. https://doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v114i2.14362.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegge J, Jeppesen HJ, Weber WG, Pearce CL, Silva SA, Pundt A, et al. Promoting work motivation in Organizations: should employee involvement in Organizational Leadership become a New Tool in the Organizational psychologist’s kit? J Personnel Psychol. 2010;9:154–71. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000025.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen K, Randall R. The importance of employee participation and perceptions of changes in procedures in a teamworking intervention. Work Stress. 2012;26:91–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2012.682721.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck D, Taşkan E, Elskamp E, Gold M, Gregersen S, Klamroth H, et al. Consideration of psychosocial factors in risk assessment. Recommendations for implementation in business practice; 2022.

  • Abildgaard JS, Hasson H, von Thiele Schwarz U, Løvseth LT, Ala-Laurinaho A, Nielsen K. Forms of participation: the development and application of a conceptual model of participation in work environment interventions. Econ Ind Democr. 2020;41:746–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X17743576.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullrich A, Reißig M, Niehoff S, Beier G. Employee involvement and participation in digital transformation: a combined analysis of literature and practitioners’ expertise. JOCM. 2023;36:29–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-10-2022-0302.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan M, Bambra C, Thomas S, Petticrew M, Whitehead M, Thomson H. The psychosocial and health effects of workplace reorganisation. 1. A systematic review of organisational-level interventions that aim to increase employee control. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61:945–54. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2006.054965.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Taitel MS, Haufle V, Heck D, Loeppke R, Fetterolf D. Incentives and other factors associated with employee participation in health risk assessments. J Occup Environ Med. 2008;50:863–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181845fe2.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatti KK, Qureshi TM. Impact of employee participation on job satisfaction, employee commitment and employee productivity. Int Rev Bus Res Papers. 2007:54–68.

  • Holman D, Axtell C. Can job redesign interventions influence a broad range of employee outcomes by changing multiple job characteristics? A quasi-experimental study. J Occup Health Psychol. 2016;21:284–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039962.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolg S, Heiden B, Herbig B. Digitally connected work and its consequences for strain – a systematic review. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2021;16:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00333-z.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • van Aerden K, Vanroelen C, Gevaert J. The impact of New technologies on the quality of work. In: Wahrendorf M, Chandola T, Descatha A, editors. Handbook of Life Course Occupational Health. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94023-2_26-1.

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar 

  • Reif JAM, Spieß E, Pfaffinger KF. Dealing with stress in a modern work environment. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021.

    Book 

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne U. Work-life balance. Bus Inform Rev. 2005;22:53–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382105052268.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy MJ, Lee D-J. Work-Life Balance: an integrative review. Appl Res Qual Life. 2018;13:229–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-017-9509-8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichl C, Leiter MP, Spinath FM. Work–nonwork conflict and burnout: a meta-analysis. Hum Relat. 2014;67:979–1005. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713509857.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews RA, Wayne JH, Ford MT. A work-family conflict/subjective well-being process model: a test of competing theories of longitudinal effects. J Appl Psychol. 2014;99:1173–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036674.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford MT, Heinen BA, Langkamer KL. Work and family satisfaction and conflict: a meta-analysis of cross-domain relations. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92:57–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.57.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Li C, Chen Y, Zheng C, Zhang F, Huang Y, Birch S. Relationships between job satisfaction, organizational commitment, burnout and job performance of healthcare professionals in a district-level health care system of Shenzhen, China. Front Psychol. 2022;13:992258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.992258.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Abeliansky AL, Beulmann M. Are they coming for us? Industrial robots and the mental health of workers; 2019.

  • Barber LK, Santuzzi AM. Please respond ASAP: Workplace telepressure and employee recovery. J Occup Health Psychol. 2015;20:172–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038278.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtgrewe U. New new technologies: the future and the present of work in information and communication technology. New Technol Work Employ. 2014;29:9–24.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Borle P, Reichel K, Niebuhr F, Voelter-Mahlknecht S. How are Techno-Stressors Associated with Mental Health and Work outcomes? A Systematic Review of Occupational Exposure to Information and Communication Technologies within the Technostress Model. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168673.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg-Beckhoff G, Nielsen G, Ladekjær Larsen E. Use of information communication technology and stress, burnout, and mental health in older, middle-aged, and younger workers – results from a systematic review. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2018;1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10773525.2018.1436015.

  • Kirby EL, Golden AG, Medved CE, Jorgenson J, Buzzanell PM. An Organizational Communication Challenge to the discourse of work and Family Research: from problematics to empowerment. Annals Int Communication Association. 2003;27:1–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2003.11679020.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel A, Bosch C, Rexroth M. Mindfulness as a cognitive – emotional segmentation strategy: an intervention promoting work – life balance. J Occup Organizational Psychol. 2014;87:733–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOOP.12072.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulger CA, Matthews RA, Hoffman ME. Work and personal life boundary management: boundary strength, work/personal life balance, and the segmentation-integration continuum. J Occup Health Psychol. 2007;12:365–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.4.365.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham M, Niessen C, Schnabel C, Lorek K, Grimm V, Möslein K, Wrede M. Electronic monitoring at work: the role of attitudes, functions, and perceived control for the acceptance of tracking technologies. Hum Resource Manage J. 2019;29:657–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12250.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Charalampous M, Grant CA, Tramontano C, Michailidis E. Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: a multidimensional approach. Eur J Work Organizational Psychol. 2019;28:51–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäkikangas A, Juutinen S, Mäkiniemi J-P, Sjöblom K, Oksanen A. Work engagement and its antecedents in remote work: a person-centered view. Work Stress. 2022;36:392–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2022.2080777.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirmohammadi M, Au WC, Beigi M. Remote work and work-life balance: lessons learned from the covid-19 pandemic and suggestions for HRD practitioners. Hum Resource Dev Int. 2022;25:163–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2047380.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimura A, Yokoi K, Ishibashi Y, Akatsuka Y, Inoue T. Remote work decreases psychological and physical stress responses, but full-remote work increases Presenteeism. Front Psychol. 2021;12:730969. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.730969.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurofound EU-OSHA. Psychosocial risks in Europe: prevalence and strategies for prevention. Luxembourg; 2014.

  • Cox T, Leka S. PRIMA-EF: Guidance on the European framework for psychosocial risk management: a resource for employers and workers representatives. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint German Occupational Safety and Health Strategy. Detailed Concept and Occupational Safety and Health Objectives 2008–2012 2007.

  • Gemeinsame Deutsche Arbeitsschutzstrategie. Leitlinie „Beratung und Überwachung bei psychischer Belastung am Arbeitsplatz 2018. Berlin.

  • Ruotsalainen J, Serra C, Marine A, Verbeek J. Systematic review of interventions for reducing occupational stress in health care workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2008;34:169–78. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1240.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruotsalainen J, Verbeek J, Mariné A, Serra C. Preventing occupational stress in healthcare workers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;CD002892. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002892.pub4.

  • Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, van Rhenen W. How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism. J Organ Behav. 2009;30:893–917. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.595.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhuys Roozeboom MC, Schelvis RMC, Houtman ILD, Wiezer NM, Bongers PM. Decreasing employees’ work stress by a participatory, organizational level work stress prevention approach: a multiple-case study in primary education. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:676. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08698-2.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen K, Stage M, Abildgaard JS, Brauer CV. Participatory intervention from an organizational perspective: employees as active agents in creating a healthy work environment. In: Bauer GF, Bauer GF, editors. Salutogenic organizations and change: the concepts behind organizational health intervention research. Dordrecht, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. pp. 327–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6470-5_18.

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar 

  • Giusino D, de Angelis M. Pietrantoni L. Digital Solutions for Workplace Mental Health Promotion During COVID-19 Pandemic: Taxonomy and Human Factors Issues. In: Black NL, Neumann WP, Noy I, editors. Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021): Volume IV: Healthcare and Healthy Work. 1st ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing; Imprint Springer; 2021. pp. 564–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74611-7_76

  • Forsyth S, Polzer-Debruyne A. The organisational pay-offs for perceived work-life balance support. Asia Pac J Hum Resour. 2007;45:113–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038411107073610.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava S, Kanpur RA, Study On Quality Of Work Life.: Key Elements & It’s Implications. IOSRJBM. 2014;16:54–9. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-16315459

  • Sonnentag S, Cheng BH, Parker SL. Recovery from work: advancing the Field toward the future. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2022;9:33–60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091355.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebig M, Angerer P. Description and application of a method to quantify criterion-related cut-off values for questionnaire-based psychosocial risk assessment. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-020-01597-4.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Thur K, Angerer P, Körner U, Dragano N. Arbeit Mit Digitalen Technologien, psychosoziale belastungen und potenzielle gesundheitliche Konsequenzen. ASU Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed. 2018;53:388–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebig M, Dragano N, Körner U, Lunau T, Wulf IC, Angerer P. Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure Psychosocial Work stressors in Modern Working environments. J Occup Environ Med. 2020;62:185–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001779.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebig M, Jungmann F, Müller A, Wulf IC. Inhalts- Und prozessbezogene Anforderungen an die Gefährdungsbeurteilung Psychischer Belastung Im Kontext Industrie 4.0. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- Und Organisationspsychologie A&O. 2018;62:53–67. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000265

  • Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62:107–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Haar JM, Russo M, Suñe A, Ollier-Malaterre A. Outcomes of work–life balance on job satisfaction, life satisfaction and mental health: a study across seven cultures. J Vocat Behav. 2014;85:361–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.08.010.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dén-Nagy I. A double-edged sword? A critical evaluation of the mobile phone in creating work-life balance. New Technol Work Employ. 2014;29:193–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12031.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer P, Mulder RH. The effects of Technological Developments on Work and their implications for continuous Vocational Education and Training: a systematic review. Front Psychol. 2020;11:918. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00918.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempell T, Zwick T, NEW TECHNOLOGY WORKORGANISATION. Innov Econ Innov New Technol. 2008;17:331–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590701279649.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Adisa TA, Gbadamosi G, Osabutey EL. What happened to the border? The role of mobile information technology devices on employees’ work-life balance. Personnel Rev. 2017;46:1651–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-08-2016-0222.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghislieri C, Molino M, Cortese CG. Work and organizational psychology looks at the Fourth Industrial Revolution: how to support workers and organizations? Front Psychol. 2018;9:2365. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02365.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Methot JR, LePine JA. Too close for comfort? Investigating the Nature and Functioning of Work and Non-work Role Segmentation preferences. J Bus Psychol. 2016;31:103–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9402-0.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio B, Charles V, Bautista MLA. Inter-domain role transitions and work‐family life balance: the mediating effect of integration and segmentation preferences. Glob Bus Org Exc. 2023;42:19–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22199.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade C, Matias M. Work-related ICT use during off-job time, technology to family conflict and segmentation preference: a study with two generations of employees. Inform Communication Soc. 2022;25:2162–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1933564.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma T-N, van Vu H. How job autonomy influences life satisfaction: the role of work-family enrichment and segmentation preference. IJOA. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-05-2023-3762

  • Karasek R. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q. 1979:285–308.

  • Karasek R, Theorell T. Healthy work: stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jonge J, Dollard MF, Dormann C, Le Blanc PM, Houtman ILD. The Demand-Control Model: Specific Demands, Specific Control, and Well-Defined Groups. Special Issue: Stress and Its Management in Occupational Settings. 2000;7:269–87. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009541929536

  • van der Molen HF, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Frings-Dresen MHW, de Groene G. Work-related psychosocial risk factors for stress-related mental disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e034849. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034849.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Calogiuri G, Beldo S, Roveda E, Montaruli A, Carandente F, Weydahl A. Training time and adaptation to lack of daylight: a case report. Sport Sci Health. 2009;5:37–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-009-0074-x.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchon JC, Smith TJ. Extended workdays and safety. Int J Ind Ergon. 1993;11:37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(93)90053-G.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens M. Flexible work schedules and mental and physical health. A study of a working population with non-traditional working hours. J Organizational Behav. 1999:35–46.

  • Paje RC, Escobar PBA, Ruaya AMR, Sulit PAF. The impact of compressed workweek arrangements on job stress, work-Life Balance, and work Productivity of Rank-and-file employees from Different Industries in Metro Manila. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2020;1529:32055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1529/3/032055.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolino MC, Kelemen TK, Matthews SH. Working 9-to‐5? A review of research on nonstandard work schedules. J Organ Behav. 2021;42:188–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2440.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesley N. Technology use and employee assessments of work effectiveness, workload, and pace of life. Inform Communication Soc. 2010;13:485–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180903473806.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarafdar M, Cooper CL, Stich J-F. The technostress trifecta – techno eustress, techno distress and design: theoretical directions and an agenda for research. Inform Syst J. 2019;29:6–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12169.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond L, Russell H, editors. Making equality count: Irish and international research; measuring equality and discrimination. Dublin: Liffey; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card D, Mas A, Moretti E, Saez E. Inequality at work: the effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction. Am Econ Rev. 2012;102:2981–3003. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.6.2981.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranabetter C, Niessen C. Managers as role models for health: moderators of the relationship of transformational leadership with employee exhaustion and cynicism. J Occup Health Psychol. 2017;22:492–502. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000044.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch AR, Binnewies C. Setting a good example: supervisors as work-life-friendly role models within the context of boundary management. J Occup Health Psychol. 2015;20:82–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037890.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The job demands-resources model: state of the art. J Managerial Psych. 2007;22:309–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Demerouti E, Bakker AB, Bulters AJ. The loss spiral of work pressure, work–home interference and exhaustion: reciprocal relations in a three-wave study. J Vocat Behav. 2004;64:131–49.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald W. The impact of job demands and workload on stress and fatigue. Australian Psychol. 2003;38:102–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060310001707107.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolever RQ, Bobinet KJ, McCabe K, Mackenzie ER, Fekete E, Kusnick CA, Baime M. Effective and viable mind-body stress reduction in the workplace: a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Health Psychol. 2012;17:246–58. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027278.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy LR. Stress management in work settings: a critical review of the health effects. Am J Health Promot: AJHP. 1996;11:112–35. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.112.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Herr RM, Barrech A, Riedel N, Gündel H, Angerer P, Li J. Long-term effectiveness of stress management at work: effects of the changes in perceived stress reactivity on Mental Health and sleep problems seven years later. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020255.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdin S, Welch RK, Byron-Daniel J, Meyrick J. The effectiveness of physical activity interventions in improving well-being across office-based workplace settings: a systematic review. Public Health. 2018;160:70–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2018.03.029.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Larisch L-M, Blom V, Hagströmer M, Ekblom M, Ekblom Ö, Nilsson J, Kallings LV. Improving movement behavior in office workers: effects of two multi-level cluster-RCT interventions on mental health. BMC Public Health. 2024;24:127. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17647-2.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson LL, Leineweber C, Chungkham HS, Westerlund H. Work-home interference and its prospective relation to major depression and treatment with antidepressants. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014;40:66–73. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3378.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng C, Molineux J, Mirshekary S, Scarparo S. Developing individual and organisational work-life balance strategies to improve employee health and wellbeing. Empl Relations. 2015;37:354–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-10-2013-0142.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellner C, Aronsson G, Kecklund G. Boundary Management preferences, Boundary Control, and work-Life Balance among full-time employed professionals in Knowledge-Intensive, flexible work. NJWLS. 2015;4:7. https://doi.org/10.19154/njwls.v4i4.4705.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Althammer SE, Reis D, van der Beek S, Beck L, Michel A. A mindfulness intervention promoting work–life balance: how segmentation preference affects changes in detachment, well-being, and work–life balance. J Occup Organizational Psychol. 2021;94:282–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12346.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern DF. How time-flexible work policies can reduce stress, improve health, and save money. Stress Health. 2005;21:157–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1049.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau R, Rips LJ, Rasinski KA. The psychology of survey response. 10th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *